No one is indispensable

Time and again we keep wondering and ask ourselves what makes an individual iconic figure that can make people go delirious and mesmerized with their inspirational speech or stunning performance. On the other hand, there are people who are just content with what they have got or dare to dream big. Does being a public figure means one is superior over others in terms of fame and lavish lifestyle. Does prodigy means sheer talent by birth or is it the individual persistent effort and the desire to keep striving for the ultimate goal? Indeed their success can be derived from several factors such as indomitable spirit, perseverance, resilience, proclivity and a vision… unlike others who struggle to find a way out for survival. This question has been haunting me as if I am a victim of my own taste and priority.
As a matter of fact, what I conclude is "no one is indispensable" despite the awards and medal one possess. Even experts reckon that everyone comes and go thereby leaving a bench mark for others to follow. It’s our erroneous assumption and self notion to which we form an opinion about others and treat them like almighty. Even in sports one goes and other fills the space, so where does the question of being indispensable arise? Despite a phenomenal like Sachin not being in team, India has its share of win and losses. We don’t have any Mahatma Gandhi or Sub hash Chandra Bose but still our country is being run by various dignitaries at helm of affairs.
It’s high time we should stop contemplating about others achievements and ask ourselves as how we can make a difference in our respective domain without being put on pedestal. This can only be achieved by reinventing oneself to address the needs of the future world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Future of LCD TV in Indian market

More focus shifting towards PR professional

Is Twenty-20 a reincarnation of traditional cricket?